Sunday, December 11, 2005
Funeral Coverage
I chanced upon the Reuters coverage of Nir Kahana's funeral at Yahoo. I was struck by the sense that the slightest something was just...missing...from their coverage of the event:
Just to check, I looked for the AP version of the same funeral, and did find some niggling differences:
AP did apparently notice that Nir hadn't died from a tragic shaving accident, nor had he died from a fit of apoplexy yelling at poor Palestinian old ladies while standing guard at his checkpoint. He was stabbed to death.
It isn't really all that hard to explain how someone died. Newswires do it all the time: "killed by Israeli air strike" or "shot and killed by an Israeli naval boat," just for instance.
I suppose I should just be happy AP bothers to put any context on an Israeli soldier's death, and chalk the rest of it up to innocent Reuters oversights.
But I actually can manage to find a bone to pick even with AP's coverage. Like Reuters, they show images of Nir's mourning comrades comforting each other:
An Israeli funeral features the tears of soldiers, comrades in arms and oppression. But is that a big deal?
Only when you consider what the typical Palestinian funeral coverage looks like:
and
Even suicide bombers who murder innocent Israelis have grieving sisters:
Murdered Israelis have only their grieving militaristic cohorts.
One last little point, since I can't seem to stop myself today. If you look at my previous post, about the nasty barbed wire at the Kalandia checkpoint as photographed by Reuters, do you think there's any chance that the barbed wire lying on the ground is there because a Palestinian had just murdered someone at that very location? Doubtful, since such a possibility would obviously have been mentioned somewhere in one of the news-photo captions.
Israeli barbed wire is, by nature, gratuitous and cruel.
As is my Reuters coverage.
If you really, really liked this -- or even really, really hated it -- there's lots more:
Just to check, I looked for the AP version of the same funeral, and did find some niggling differences:
AP did apparently notice that Nir hadn't died from a tragic shaving accident, nor had he died from a fit of apoplexy yelling at poor Palestinian old ladies while standing guard at his checkpoint. He was stabbed to death.
It isn't really all that hard to explain how someone died. Newswires do it all the time: "killed by Israeli air strike" or "shot and killed by an Israeli naval boat," just for instance.
I suppose I should just be happy AP bothers to put any context on an Israeli soldier's death, and chalk the rest of it up to innocent Reuters oversights.
But I actually can manage to find a bone to pick even with AP's coverage. Like Reuters, they show images of Nir's mourning comrades comforting each other:
An Israeli funeral features the tears of soldiers, comrades in arms and oppression. But is that a big deal?
Only when you consider what the typical Palestinian funeral coverage looks like:
and
Even suicide bombers who murder innocent Israelis have grieving sisters:
Murdered Israelis have only their grieving militaristic cohorts.
One last little point, since I can't seem to stop myself today. If you look at my previous post, about the nasty barbed wire at the Kalandia checkpoint as photographed by Reuters, do you think there's any chance that the barbed wire lying on the ground is there because a Palestinian had just murdered someone at that very location? Doubtful, since such a possibility would obviously have been mentioned somewhere in one of the news-photo captions.
Israeli barbed wire is, by nature, gratuitous and cruel.
As is my Reuters coverage.